• Home
  • Don’t fall for common CLAT advice that could hurt your preparation! Discover 5 popular CLAT myths and learn what truly works to succeed in the exam.
5 Popular CLAT Preparation Myths Debunked | NLTI
May, 14 2025

Exposing 5 Popular CLAT Advice Myths That Hold You Back


Every CLAT aspirant hears the same old mantras on repeat. "Solve 100 mocks." "Read The Hindu cover to cover." "Speed matters more than accuracy." Sounds familiar?


These lines have been passed around like a prep Bible. But here’s the truth: much of this “universal” advice is either outdated, misunderstood, or flat-out counterproductive for many students. If you're stuck in the 60s-80s mark zone, clinging to these myths might be the very reason you're not improving.


It’s time to challenge what everyone blindly follows.

Myth 1: “Solve as many mocks as possible quantity over everything.”


The Reality:


Solving 100 mocks without reviewing even 10 of them properly is wasted effort. You’re not actually improving — you’re just repeating the same mistakes and calling it progress.


Mocks aren’t magic pills. The real growth lies in:


  • Detailed post-mortems


  • Error pattern analysis


  • Strategy adjustments based on results


Some toppers made it with 50 mocks. Others with 120. The difference wasn’t in the number — it was in how well they dissected each one. If you're just solving mocks and moving on, you're like a batsman who keeps playing matches but never watches replays.


Do this instead:

Limit yourself to 2–3 mocks a week and spend double the time reviewing them. Maintain an error log and revisit old mocks monthly. This builds actual retention.

Myth 2: “You must read The Hindu editorial daily to crack English and GK.”


The Reality:


Let’s be honest: for most students, reading editorials becomes a ritual with zero retention. You open the paper, skim three articles, and shut it feeling “productive.”


But did your vocabulary improve? Did your reading speed actually go up? Did you remember the international court judgment from page 12? Probably not.


CLAT isn’t testing your love for The Hindu — it’s testing your application skills. Reading the paper blindly won’t help unless:


  • You know how to break down dense text


  • You extract GK facts smartly


  • You regularly revise what you read


Do this instead:

Use tools like editorial summaries, legal newsletters, and YouTube explainers to understand content quickly. Build reading muscle through RC passages from diverse sources, not just newspapers.

Myth 3: “Focus on speed time is everything in CLAT.”


The Reality:


Speed without direction is chaos. It’s like driving fast on the wrong route.


Many aspirants race through questions, aiming to finish early — and then spend weeks wondering why accuracy is stuck at 50%. In reality:


  • Speed is a byproduct of understanding and structure.


  • CLAT rewards precision under time pressure, not reckless answering.


The top ranks don’t come from finishing fastest — they come from choosing what not to attempt, and investing the right amount of time per question.


Do this instead:

Work on strategic skipping, intelligent guessing, and calm question selection. Don’t push speed drills until your accuracy is stable at 85%+.


Myth 4: “Current affairs is all about monthly PDFs and daily quizzes.”


The Reality:


If monthly compilers were enough, CLAT prep would be about collecting PDFs — not building understanding.


The truth is — most PDFs are curated to look dense, not to be memorable. Reading 200 one-liners in a day does not mean your retention is up. You’re just drowning in facts.


CLAT current affairs questions are not dry GK — they’re often application-based, layered, and context-heavy.


Do this instead:


  • Follow fewer sources, but revise them multiple times.


  • Build issue-based awareness: understand a topic (e.g. electoral bonds) from multiple angles — legal, social, political.


  • Practice CA-based passages and inferential questions — not just static MCQs.


Myth 5: “Legal reasoning doesn’t need preparation it’s just common sense.”


The Reality:


This one’s a silent trap. Many students treat Legal Reasoning like a lottery — “I’ll just read the principle and wing it.”


But legal reasoning is not just instinct. It requires:


  • An eye for exceptions


  • An ability to stay neutral


  • Practice with long, tricky fact situations


Also, CLAT legal reasoning often tests comprehension + logic + elimination in one go. It’s not about “knowing law” — but it is about training your brain to think like a judge.


Do this instead:


  • Solve past legal sections in a timed, focused manner.


  • Learn how to eliminate tempting distractors.


  • Avoid using your own morals — that’s where most aspirants go wrong.


Final Thoughts: The Competitive Edge Comes from Clarity, Not Crowd Advice

Everyone’s grinding. They’re solving mocks, watching strategy videos, following telegram channels — yet so many stay stuck in the same score range. Why? Because most don’t stop to filter which advice deserves attention and which is just recycled noise.


CLAT doesn’t reward the most exhausted student. It rewards the one who thinks critically, adapts early, and refines consistently.


At NLTI, we don’t hand you one-size-fits-all formulas. We help you build clarity — in your prep, your strategy, and your mindset. With quality mocks, mentorship that actually knows your pain points, and advice that isn’t copied from toppers but built for you — we ensure your effort doesn’t go to waste.


Fill in Your Details & Get Free Mock Questions & Weekly Study Guides