The AILET 2026 results have reinforced a clear pattern that serious aspirants are now recognising early: structured preparation beats last-minute intensity. This year, two NLTI students have delivered standout performances at the national level:
AIR 5 – Parv Jain (AILET 2026)
AIR 6 – Manvi Yadav (AILET 2026)
Both results place NLTI among the very few institutes producing multiple top-10 ranks in AILET, not as isolated successes but as part of a repeatable system.
CLAT 2026 NLU Predictor & All India Rank Predictor
AILET is fundamentally different from CLAT. With no mathematics, high-weight Logical Reasoning, unpredictable GK, and extremely tight time pressure, the exam punishes over-reading and rewards precision.
AIR 5 and AIR 6 in such a paper reflect:
Controlled attempts, not blind speed
Strong logical filtering under pressure
GK familiarity without over-dependence on static memorisation
Emotional stability during a high-stakes, single-institute exam
Parv Jain and Manvi Yadav’s ranks came from decision discipline, not aggressive attempts.
Parv Jain (AIR 5): Precision Over Panic
Parv’s AILET preparation focused on logical clarity and error minimisation rather than volume. During NLTI mentorship sessions, his strategy revolved around:
Identifying question types worth attempting within the first scan
Avoiding over-engagement with time-draining logical sets
Treating GK as a confidence section rather than a guessing zone
In his words (from NLTI sessions):
“AILET rewards calm elimination. Once I stopped trying to solve everything,accuracy started converting into marks.”
That mindset shift was critical in securing AIR 5.
Read More: CLAT 2026 Cutoff: What to Expect vs Last Year
Manvi’s preparation stood out for its sectional balance. Instead of pushing only logical reasoning, she maintained consistency across English comprehension and GK recall, ensuring no section became a liability.
Her approach within NLTI involved:
Weekly logical drills focused on assumption and inference control
GK revision through short recall loops rather than heavy notes
Mock analysis centred on why a question was skipped, not just why it was wrong
As she reflected during mentoring interactions:
“Once I learned when not to attempt, AILET stopped feeling unpredictable.”
That clarity translated directly into AIR 6.
Read More: CLAT 2026 Section-Wise Strategy for All Subjects
Single preparation framework producing results in both CLAT and AILET
Mentorship-driven decision training, not syllabus-heavy cramming
Mock analysis focused on accuracy loss and time pressure, not just scores
Study Buddy Groups for accountability and peer-level reasoning exposure
Exam temperament conditioning, critical for single-day exams like AILET
The outcome: consistent selections at NLSIU Bangalore and NLU Delhi, driven by preparation for uncertainty, not patterns.
Read More: Top CLAT Coaching Packages for Every Budget
AILET 2026 confirms that:
Attempting fewer questions with higher certainty outperforms brute force
Logical Reasoning is about filtering, not solving everything
GK rewards familiarity, not encyclopaedic knowledge
Mentorship matters most when the exam pattern feels volatile
Parv Jain and Manvi Yadav’s results show that top AILET ranks are built months before the exam, in how decisions are trained, not how many questions are solved.
With AIR 5 and AIR 6 in AILET 2026, NLTI’s preparation model proves its strength at the very top. These results highlight a system focused on accuracy, decision-making, and exam temperament, aligning perfectly with what AILET now rewards.
